Logic & Technology

Engineering automation is credible only when meaning, calculation and responsibility remain visible.

METOMOS does not treat every layer as the same kind of AI. Each task goes to the system—or person—best suited to do it, and the handoff between them remains traceable.

The BIM production architecture itself is different — parallel inputs, symbolic AI, connected outputs.

Four distinct responsibilities

Assistance, explicit context, calculation and verification are not interchangeable.

01

Neural / Generative AI

Interprets unstructured inputs and proposes candidates.

A proposal is not an approved engineering answer.

02

Symbolic AI

Keeps object meaning, relationships and constraints explicit and inspectable.

It does not remove ambiguity that needs professional judgment.

03

Deterministic Software

Calculates quantities, costs and affected states from controlled inputs.

Results remain conditional on input quality and agreed rules.

04

Human Verification

Reviews ambiguity, exceptions, assumptions and delivery standards.

Responsibility stays visible instead of being hidden behind automation.

Engineering software

Eight working programs. A new visual standard ahead.

All eight are existing software programs with working functions in their respective fields, usable today. Their next step is to modernize the visual interface and graphics, not to build their core functions from scratch. Project-specific integration and delivery scope are defined separately. Unlike the three planned programs below, these eight are not future-development concepts.

Metom PLAN

2D design drafting

A drafting entry point for third-party CAD environments, with MetomLISP support where agreed.

Metom PRESTO

Preliminary cost · structure, finishes, earthwork

Supports preliminary estimating before complete drawings exist. A historical ±5% tolerance applies only to documented deliveries with defined scope and inputs, not every project.

Metom Finish

Finish quantity · logical 3D

Connects finishing quantities with the project’s spatial and specification context.

Metom Frame

Frame quantity

Supports detailed structural quantity work, including rebar-related information.

Metom BOQ

Bill of quantities · cost

Organises quantity and cost information for the required estimate and bid formats.

Metom 3D Simulator

Quantity-connected 3D

Connects verified quantity information with 3D views for relationship and clash review.

Metom EVMS

Cost · schedule performance

Presents CPI and SPI from connected cost, schedule and progress records.

Metom 4D Simulator

Sequence · spend simulation

Reviews 3D sequence, schedule states and period cost on a shared timeline.

Expansion modules

Metom Schema → Metom Site → Metom Persona

  • Metom Schema — automation modules for the architectural planning and schematic design stage.
  • Metom Site — BIM support for site and earthwork.
  • Metom Persona — a digital twin environment for reviewing a building's full project information.

These are future development plans, not currently available software.

2D and 3D

Complementary representations, not a replacement story.

2D drawings remain essential contractual and working documents. 3D views make spatial relationships easier to inspect. METOMOS connects their shared references and engineering context instead of declaring either one obsolete.

Likewise, 4D is not simply another geometric dimension. It connects time, activity and state to the engineering information being reviewed.

3D · 4D · 5D BIM

What METOMOS means by each dimension.

The terms are used loosely across the industry. At METOMOS each dimension is a connection, not a picture: the same engineering objects, read against geometry, then time, then cost, then the rest of the lifecycle.

3D

Objects, not shapes

Every building element is an engineering object with its own identity, geometry, material, classification and the properties its quantity depends on — traceable back to the drawing it came from. A model that only looks right is a visualization, not 3D BIM in our sense.

4D

3D connected to time

Those objects are linked to construction activities, sequence and dates. On any date the model can show the state the building should be in — and, with progress recorded, the state it is actually in, side by side.

5D

4D connected to cost

The same objects carry quantity, BOQ item and unit cost, so cost is available per object, per activity and per period. That is what makes cost traceable to the design — and what EVMS is calculated from.

xD

Beyond 5D: the lifecycle

METOM xD BIM carries the same objects forward into progress, change history, as-built and operational data, so the model at completion is the building's verified engineering record rather than a model rebuilt for handover.

So 4D is not an animation, and 5D is not a spreadsheet attached to a model. They are the same engineering objects read against time and cost — which is why a design change can move through all of them together.

Connected change propagation

A change is checked before its consequences are carried forward.

01

Receive the change and its source

02

Validate scope, version and approval state

03

Identify related objects and affected outputs

04

Recalculate the affected quantity, cost and schedule states

05

Review exceptions and professional judgments

06

Publish the verified project state with traceable evidence

This is not a promise that one edit blindly changes everything. Only affected states are recalculated, and judgment or exceptions remain available for review.

LOD

Information reliability, not visual realism.

LOD describes how developed and reliable model information is for an intended use at a project stage. A higher label does not by itself guarantee photorealism, dimensional accuracy or fitness for every downstream task.

Foundry delivery can include LOD 400-class fabrication, assembly or installation information where the agreed scope requires it. Richer or verified as-built information is defined and accepted project by project.

Evaluate the logic in context

Define the input, output and review standard before judging automation.